Course Reviews for
Westcliff University
7/10
average rating
no filters applied
-
8 /10
Major: DBA
BUS 830 Enterprise Software Engineering Management
Instructor: Mahmoud Elsayess
Delivery: online
8 /10
The class was very good, and the professor is very helpful with students. I got an A for working hard and completing all the assignments on time. I will recommend this professor and class.
12/10/2024
-
1 /10
Major: DBA
BUS 535 Managerial Accounting
Instructor: Ali Saad
Delivery: online
1 /10
Worst professor, you cannot get good grade regardless of the quality of the work/assignments. If you want good grades and feel appredciated then go for this. Course is good but pick professor wisely. The only less than A grade I had in my entire academics was this course from this specific professor.
12/10/2024
-
10 /10
Major: MATESOL
TSL 527 Methods of Teaching ESL/EFL
Instructor: Reannah Sartoris
Delivery: onsite
10 /10
I'll definitely give her a 10 out of 10. First of all, she's the one of the few professors in this program who know what they are doing. Some of the instructors only reads the slides and they know nothing about the content of the course. But Professor Sartoris is not. She has great experience in this field and works hard to teach us! Second, she gives everyone high scores as long as you follow her instruction on the class and hand in the assignments on time! Perfect!
12/08/2024
-
9 /10
Major: DBA
MGT 700 Managing People and Organizations
Instructor: Joshua Cain
Delivery: online
9 /10
The MGT 700 course on Managing People and Organizations provided a comprehensive dive into organizational behavior, equipping students with critical management skills and theoretical insights. The course structure was intentionally robust, covering eight weeks of intensive learning that progressively built management competencies. The reading load was significant, with each week requiring us to digest substantial textbook chapters (ranging from 29 to 44 pages) alongside supplementary video materials. This multimodal approach reflected the professor's emphasis on diverse learning methods, combining traditional text-based learning with contemporary video content. The readings covered essential topics such as organizational environment, individual behavior, motivation, team dynamics, communication, conflict management, and organizational change. Assignments were thoughtfully designed to go beyond academic exercises, requiring deep personal reflection and practical application. For instance, the Affectivity Professional Assignment challenged us to analyze workplace emotional patterns, while the Conflict Professional Assignment required analyzing a real-world conflict scenario. The culminating Course Evaluation Comprehensive Learning Assessment was particularly impressive, as it involved developing a strategic influence plan and presenting it via a recorded presentation. The grading structure was transparent and balanced. Participation accounted for 15% of the grade, fostering active engagement. Professional assignments were weighted more heavily, with the Conflict Assignment and Course Evaluation being the most significant at 18% and 21%, respectively. This approach highlighted the course's emphasis on practical skill demonstration alongside theoretical knowledge. The course learning outcomes were explicitly tied to broader program outcomes, reflecting a strategic approach to educational design. We were expected to develop skills in team management, understanding organizational environments, recognizing psychological foundations of workplace behavior, and comprehending how organizational systems shape individual actions. The syllabus strongly emphasized academic integrity, with a detailed copyright notice and clear guidelines about reproducing course materials. This reinforced the course’s commitment to ethical academic practices. A notable feature of the course was its flexibility, offering both online and on-campus options. The university provided extensive digital resources, including access to over 80 million scholarly resources, which we could leverage for research and assignments. The assessment methods were diverse: discussion questions, written reflections, a comprehensive learning assessment presentation, and ongoing participation. This variety ensured that we were evaluated not just on theoretical knowledge but also on our ability to analyze, reflect, and communicate management concepts. The course presented certain challenges, such as the intensive reading and assignment schedule, the need for critical self-reflection, the integration of multiple theoretical concepts, and the development of comprehensive presentation skills. However, these challenges also made it particularly suited for aspiring managers, those interested in organizational psychology, or professionals seeking to deepen their understanding of workplace dynamics. While the syllabus did not directly detail the professor’s teaching style, the carefully constructed course design reflected a methodical, comprehensive approach to management education. The emphasis on practical application, diverse learning methods, and holistic skill development demonstrated a modern, student-centered pedagogical approach. For those of us who took this course, it was more than just an academic requirement—it was an opportunity to develop a nuanced understanding of organizational behavior, critical thinking skills, and practical management competencies.
12/06/2024
-
9 /10
Major: DBA
FIN 700 Financial Risk Management
Instructor: Xi Bai
Delivery: online
9 /10
The FIN 700: Financial Risk Management course with Professor Bai is a solid choice if you're looking to dive deep into the world of financial risks and decision-making. The course packs a lot into eight weeks, covering everything from asset allocation and capital budgeting to international financial decisions. It's all tied together with the textbook *Principles of Corporate Finance* by Brealey, Myers, and Allen, which is pretty much a gold standard in finance education. If you're serious about understanding financial risk management, this course is a great option. One thing to know upfront: the workload is no joke. Each week has you tackling a hefty reading list (20–30 textbook pages, plus extras) and jumping into assignments like discussion questions, peer responses, professional projects, and even a couple of big assessments. You'll need to stay on top of things because it’s all spaced out to keep you busy every week. While it’s manageable if you’re organized, it could feel overwhelming if you’re juggling work or other commitments. Class discipline is more about structure than strict rules, but it’s definitely there. Participation matters—15% of your grade, to be exact—so you’ll need to engage in weekly discussions and respond to classmates. The midterm is proctored, which means you'll need to validate your identity and complete it under monitored conditions. These elements make sure everyone stays on track and plays fair, which is good if you value a focused learning environment. Attendance is tied to participation, so you can’t just coast through without showing up (virtually or otherwise). The online format is flexible, but you’ll still need to log in regularly, contribute to discussions, and stay involved. It’s not a course where you can go off the radar for a week and expect to catch up easily. Professor Bai’s teaching style leans heavily on real-world applications, which makes the material feel relevant. Whether you’re analyzing a case about lottery winnings or breaking down the profitability of corporate projects, the assignments are designed to make you think critically and connect the dots between theory and practice. The final week even gets a bit personal, asking you to reflect on your challenges and experiences with financial risk management. It’s a nice touch that makes the course feel more grounded. Overall, this class is well-organized and challenging in all the right ways. The content is top-notch, and the mix of videos, articles, and case studies keeps it interesting. That said, it’s not a walk in the park. The workload can pile up quickly, and you’ll need to manage your time well to keep up with everything. But if you’re ready to put in the effort, you’ll come out with a strong understanding of financial risk management and some practical tools to apply in real-life situations. In short, FIN 700 is a great pick for anyone who’s serious about finance and ready to tackle a challenging but rewarding course. Just be prepared to stay on top of things—it’s not a course to take lightly!
12/06/2024
-
1 /10
Major: MBA
RES 600 Business Research Methodology
Instructor: Sara Howe
Delivery: online
1 /10
Many students in this class are overwhelmed by life and work pressures. Hence, many prefer not to confront problematic behavior like Sara’s, despite Sara Howe often being unreasonable and dismissive of legitimate student grievances. Many classmates have discussed her bullying tactics and have reported her behavior to advisors, but Sara remains indifferent. It seems Sara feels she is above us and the school’s rules, exploiting the system and the vulnerabilities of international students. This covert discrimination is hard to prove but deeply felt and harmed. I am sure that Sara did not receive favorable evaluations at the end of this course. Such reviews should offer thorough insight into her character and conduct. Sara's misconducts, which disregard academic integrity and exploit her authority, not only harm students but also tarnish the reputation of Westcliff University. SARA SHOULD BE FIRED!
12/04/2024
-
3 /10
Major: MBA
MKT 602 Market Research
Instructor: Sebrina Dunston
Delivery: onsite
3 /10
整节课只有3个人,onsite2人。地狱模式。。。不停的需要和老师互动回答问题。每节课都有个人作业需要present。最后还有一个大presentation。老师从不提前下课,每次都是最后放学的。。
12/04/2024
-
9 /10
Major: MBA
MKT 601 Digital Marketing Metrics & Management
Instructor: Seyed Ghoraishi
Delivery: onsite
9 /10
老师给分很好,onsite没有小组讨论,全程自己讲。但需要随时回答问题。有一次老师连续发问木有人理他,然后就叫我们不许用手机和电脑了。。。
12/04/2024
-
1 /10
Major: DBA
MGT 700 Managing People and Organizations
Instructor: Jodi Consten
Delivery: online
1 /10
I would give 0 rating if I could. This is professional format classes, and we only meet with the professor twice during a 8-week session. This makes it hard to receive timely feedback on assignments already. Plus, it took the professor 2 weeks to grade assignments (for other classes you get grades normally less than one week), so please expect to be in the dark, then receive low scores for consecutive weeks. The professor gives extremely low score - I'm not talking about 80+ or 70+, I'm talking about 60/100. This applies to you even if you are taking your 1ST DBA class. The professor is very "nice" as she allows you to re-write assignment and re-submit. In the first weekend online session, she proudly mentioned that "one of her student resubmit 4 times for credit". So yes, you can re-write, but again, this is 8 weeks classes, it took 2 weeks for her to give you low score, then you take 1 weeks to re-write, then it took her 2+weeks to let you know whether your re-submission is satisfying. On top of that, you will need to re-write your second week assignment, third week assignment...etc. Do your math, and you will understand the frustration here.
12/03/2024
-
1 /10
Major: DBA
RES 700 Business Research Methods I
Instructor: Sara Howe
Delivery: online
1 /10
If U were unfortunately assigned to Sara's class, I would strongly advise U to immediately request a course change with the school. Due to her long-standing poor behavior, the number of students in her class has decreased to just 2 this semester (I truly feel sorry for those two). Please make sure to carefully review every comment here, as they should help U make the best decision. With her low academic integrity and abilities, the fact that the school still pays her salary is a punishment to other excellent teachers. Sara, no matter how your past experiences have hurt you and shaped you into who you are today, you need to let go of those inferior human qualities and strive to become a teacher with good character. On this Thanksgiving, I hope Sara Howe can be thankful for the job she currently has. Because, in my opinion, Sara doesn't deserve this job. Sara is way below the standard. But I pray to God that He gives Sara more opportunities for self-improvement, and I hope Sara cherishes them.
11/28/2024
Log in to see all reviews and access filters.